2003 BMW M3 vs. 1989 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 1989 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | BMW | Plymouth |
Model | M3 | Sundance |
Year Released | 2003 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2470 mm |