2003 BMW M3 vs. 1995 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1995 Ford Ranger. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 47 kg more than 1995 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (300 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW M3 1995 Ford Ranger
Make BMW Ford
Model M3 Ranger
Year Released 2003 1995
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 2507 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 240 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 198 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1442 kg 1395 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2840 mm