2003 BMW M3 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier

To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 194 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier. (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW M3 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier
Make BMW Chevrolet
Model M3 Cavalier
Year Released 2003 1996
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3168 cc 2189 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 342 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 7900 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 350 Nm 183 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.5:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1385 kg 1191 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4600 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2570 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.4 L/100km 14 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 57 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]