2003 BMW M3 vs. 2000 BMW 328
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2000 BMW 328. (192 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 328 weights approximately 203 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 328. (279 Nm). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 2000 BMW 328 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | M3 | 328 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 2801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 192 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 279 Nm |
Top Speed | 259 km/hour | 206 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1588 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 63 L |