2003 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Chrysler Java
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW M3 | 2000 Chrysler Java | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | M3 | Java |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1580 mm |
