2003 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Holden UTE
To start off, both 2003 BMW M3 and 2003 Holden UTE were released in the same year (2003). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2003 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden UTE weights approximately 58 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW M3. (300 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 2003 Holden UTE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | UTE |
Year Released | 2003 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2950 mm |