2003 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (188 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 574 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.

Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (300 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Tundra.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW M3 2004 Toyota Tundra
Make BMW Toyota
Model M3 Tundra
Year Released 2003 2004
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 3376 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 240 HP 188 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3400 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 298 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.8 mm 82 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1442 kg 2016 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 5530 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3270 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 100 L