2003 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 374 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (300 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. (145 Nm). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 2005 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | M3 | Aveo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |