2003 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 324 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M3 | 300 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 3516 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1709 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3190 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |