2003 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 76 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.

Because 2005 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (300 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW M3 2005 Mazda Tribute
Make BMW Mazda
Model M3 Tribute
Year Released 2003 2005
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 2262 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 240 HP 155 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 206 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.8 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1442 kg 1518 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 62 L