2003 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (165 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.
Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | BMW | Saab |
Model | M3 | 9000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1665 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |