2003 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | BMW | Isuzu |
Model | M3 | I-350 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 3458 cc |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 74 L |