2003 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Suzuki XL7

To start off, 2009 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Suzuki XL7. (252 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 305 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.

Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki XL7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Suzuki XL7. (330 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Suzuki XL7. 2009 Suzuki XL7 has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Suzuki XL7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW M3 2009 Suzuki XL7
Make BMW Suzuki
Model M3 XL7
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3168 cc 3562 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 342 HP 252 HP
Engine RPM 7900 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 350 Nm 330 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 2300 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.5:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1385 kg 1690 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 5020 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.4 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 17.8 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.4 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]