2003 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac STS. (302 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac STS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 417 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW M3. (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW M3. 2010 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW M3 2010 Cadillac STS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model M3 STS
Year Released 2003 2010
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3168 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 342 HP 302 HP
Engine RPM 7900 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 350 Nm 368 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 5200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1385 kg 1802 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4996 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1844 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1463 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2957 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.4 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 17.8 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 64 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]