2003 BMW M3 vs. 2010 SSC Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Aero is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 822 more horse power than 2003 BMW M3. (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 149 kg more than 2010 SSC Aero.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 1057 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW M3. (300 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2010 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 2010 SSC Aero | |
Make | BMW | SSC |
Model | M3 | Aero |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 1062 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 1357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 380 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1293 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1090 mm |