2003 BMW M3 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Sonic

To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Sonic. (138 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Sonic.

Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (300 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Sonic. (169 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Sonic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW M3 2012 Chevrolet Sonic
Make BMW Chevrolet
Model M3 Sonic
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 1800 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 240 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 169 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 3800 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4039 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1735 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1516 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2525 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 46 L