2003 BMW M3 vs. 2012 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2012 Subaru Outback. (170 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 175 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.
Because 2012 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (300 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Subaru Outback. (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 2012 Subaru Outback | |
Make | BMW | Subaru |
Model | M3 | Outback |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1617 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |