2003 BMW X Activity vs. 1968 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2003 BMW X Activity is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher.
Because 2003 BMW X Activity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X Activity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X Activity | 1968 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | X Activity | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2750 mm |
