2003 BMW X Activity vs. 1992 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2003 BMW X Activity is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X Activity is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X Activity (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1992 Ford Taurus. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X Activity should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Because 2003 BMW X Activity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X Activity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X Activity (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Taurus. (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X Activity will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X Activity | 1992 Ford Taurus | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X Activity | Taurus |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |