2003 BMW X Activity vs. 2009 Volvo S60
To start off, 2009 Volvo S60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X Activity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X Activity would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X Activity is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S60 (258 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 BMW X Activity. (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X Activity.
Because 2003 BMW X Activity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X Activity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S60 (350 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X Activity. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X Activity.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X Activity | 2009 Volvo S60 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | X Activity | S60 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 258 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |