2003 BMW X3 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X3 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | X3 | XK |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2600 mm |
