2003 BMW X3 vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. (169 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 BMW X3 has automatic transmission and 1952 Talbot Saoutchik has manual transmission. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 BMW X3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | BMW | Talbot |
Model | X3 | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3160 mm |