2003 BMW X3 vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | X3 | Munga |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 31 L |