2003 BMW X3 vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (189 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X3 | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | X3 | Polara |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2960 mm |
