2003 BMW X3 vs. 1963 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 285 kg more than 2003 BMW X3.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X3. (300 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 1963 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X3 | Sixty |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 79 L |