2003 BMW X3 vs. 1965 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 170 kg more than 2003 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X3 | 1965 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X3 | Calais |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 95 L |
