2003 BMW X3 vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 820 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X3 | 1965 DKW Munga | |
| Make | BMW | DKW |
| Model | X3 | Munga |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 31 L |
