2003 BMW X3 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X3 (410 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | X3 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 64 L |