2003 BMW X3 vs. 1966 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 74 kg more than 2003 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X3 | 1966 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X3 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 6954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 2004 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 82 L |
