2003 BMW X3 vs. 1967 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,952 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X3 | 1967 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X3 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 6952 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 82 L |
