2003 BMW X3 vs. 1967 Renault 4
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 1967 Renault 4 | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | X3 | 4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 38 L |