2003 BMW X3 vs. 1982 Renault 5
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1982 Renault 5. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 960 kg more than 1982 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Renault 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X3 (410 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 5. (221 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X3 | 1982 Renault 5 | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | X3 | 5 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 7.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.2 seconds | 6.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 51 L |
