2003 BMW X3 vs. 1997 Rover 414i

To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1997 Rover 414i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Rover 414i. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X3 (410 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 2003 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i. 2003 BMW X3 has automatic transmission and 1997 Rover 414i has manual transmission. 1997 Rover 414i will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 BMW X3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: