2003 BMW X3 vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 395 kg more than 2003 BMW X3.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X3 (410 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X3 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3510 mm |