2003 BMW X3 vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 524 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X3 (410 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Compass. (319 Nm). This means 2003 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | X3 | Compass |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 410 Nm | 319 Nm |
Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2660 mm |