2003 BMW X3 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X3 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2003 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X3. (245 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X3 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 132 L |