2003 BMW X3 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X3 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (201 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 BMW X3 has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 BMW X3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X3 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | X3 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 94 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |
