2003 BMW X3 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X3 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X3. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X3. 2003 BMW X3 has automatic transmission and 2007 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2007 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 BMW X3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | X3 | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |