2003 BMW X3 vs. 2009 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X3 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 106 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XJ.

Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X3. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X3.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW X3 2009 Jaguar XJ
Make BMW Jaguar
Model X3 XJ
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2492 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 185 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 560 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.1:1
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1840 kg 1734 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 5220 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 3170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 67 L 84 L