2003 BMW X3 vs. 2010 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X3 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X3 (201 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X3 (410 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (320 Nm). This means 2003 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. 2003 BMW X3 has automatic transmission and 2010 Daewoo Tocsa has manual transmission. 2010 Daewoo Tocsa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 BMW X3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 2010 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | X3 | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 410 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |