2003 BMW X3 vs. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X3 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3.
Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X3 | 2011 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | BMW | SsangYong |
Model | X3 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |