2003 BMW X5 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1952 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | X5 | 40 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3090 mm |