2003 BMW X5 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X5 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X5 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 79 L |
