2003 BMW X5 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | 62 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 75 L |