2003 BMW X5 vs. 1960 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1960 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1960 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 95 L |