2003 BMW X5 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 BMW X5. (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X5 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 40 L |