2003 BMW X5 vs. 1965 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 BMW X5. (227 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1965 Jaguar MK X.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Jaguar MK X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X5. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1965 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | X5 | MK X |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 63 L |