2003 BMW X5 vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 1535 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | BMW | DAF |
Model | X5 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 33 L |