2003 BMW X5 vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 869 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (400 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X5 | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | X5 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 338 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
