2003 BMW X5 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | X5 | 850 K |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |